Proposed Rule Designed To Improve Outcomes Following Low Back Injuries

By Bradley K. Sinnott and Rosemary D. Welsh

The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation is considering a new rule to discourage the use of opioid medication and surgery for low back injuries in favor of conservative treatment. While the rule does not prohibit the use of opioids to manage pain, it promotes physical therapy, chiropractic care, anti-inflammatories and other nonsurgical treatments instead. If adopted, the rule would be the second time in two years that the Bureau has acted to restrict opioid use, the first being the prescribing rule that became effective in all claims on January 1, 2017, and limits reimbursement for the use of opioids.

The focus of the proposed rule is to implement best medical practices for treatment of low back injuries and facilitate an injured worker’s return to work as quickly as possible. From a study of lumbar fusion outcomes in Ohio, the Bureau concluded that patients treated with fusion were able to return to work only 26 percent of the time, while workers treated non-surgically were able to return to work 67 percent of the time. Fusion patients also had an increased use of narcotics, which continued for more than two years in a whopping 76 percent of fused patients. These and other facts are included in a form entitled “What BWC Wants You to Know About Lumbar Fusion Surgery” that the Bureau would require the patient and the patient’s doctors to sign before fusion surgery is authorized. Failure to follow the requirements of the rule may result in the surgery’s not being reimbursed and the surgeon’s practices being scrutinized.

If the proposed rule is approved, it will be effective January 1, 2018.

To learn more about Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP and its labor and employment group, visit this link.

35 thoughts on “Proposed Rule Designed To Improve Outcomes Following Low Back Injuries

  1. “That is the right blog for anyone who desires to find out about this topic. You understand a lot its nearly laborious to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!”

  2. Excellent website. A lot of useful info here. I¦m sending it to several buddies ans additionally sharing in delicious. And of course, thank you to your sweat!

  3. “I like the helpful information you provide in your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and check again here frequently. I’m quite certain I’ll learn lots of new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!”

  4. Limerick look at the cost blueprint has fed fears a major froth is forming and could be about to burst. But le cours du bitcoin a discuter the late-model price disarm follows multiple warnings over the model 12 months that the practical currency was nearing a peak.

  5. It’s solidified plenty as it is to make plain to non-SEOs how to power a webpage. In an increasingly labyrinthine field, to do accurately you’ve Comment suivre le cours du bitcoin live got to have a godly treat on a wide classification of detailed subjects. This printing of Whiteboard Friday covers a nine-point checklist of the major items you’ve got to mongrel away to sequence soldiers in the contemporary year — and perhaps be given some hints on how to explain it to others, too.

  6. I drop a leave a response each time I appreciate a article on a website or if I have something to valuable to contribute to the discussion. Usually it’s a result of the sincerness displayed in the post I browsed. And on this post. I was excited enough to drop a thought 😉 I actually do have a couple of questions for you if you don’t mind. Is it just me or do some of the responses look as if they are coming from brain dead people? 😛 And, if you are posting on other online social sites, I would like to keep up with anything new you have to post. Could you list all of your communal pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

  7. After example, it desire usually make sagacity for the benefit of someone earning $50,000 a year without cours du bitcoin btc en euros a heavy portfolio to resign an investment advisor wholly, unless there are some behavioral advantages that lead to preferably outcomes or the convenience is entirely worth it, as it is to varied people, as an alternative opting repayment for a handful of well-selected, low-cost marker funds.

  8. A given look at the quotation design has fed fears a major carbonation is forming and could be about to burst. But le cours du bitcoin a discuter the fresh cost disarm follows multiple warnings greater than the form 12 months that the virtual currency was nearing a peak.

  9. Towards warning, it bequeath often make sense for someone earning $50,000 a year without cours du bitcoin btc en euros a huge portfolio to waive an investment advisor wholly, unless there are some behavioral advantages that assume command of to preferably outcomes or the convenience is really good it, as it is to varied people, as an alternative opting for a small number of well-selected, low-cost index funds.

  10. Acclimated users cours du bitcoin btc en euros are downhearted, with in unison reader claiming the imaginative, simpler service “lacks the functions and statistics rival brokers have provided appropriate for years.”

    Investors have demolished the talents to behave in abroad shares, the fresh service is uncompetitive in search those with portfolios of £100,000 or more, and root knowledge with reference to investment trusts is absent.

  11. For example, it will often make sense for someone earning $50,000 a year without a le portefeuille bitcoin online large portfolio to forgo an investment advisor altogether, unless there are some behavioral advantages that lead to better outcomes or the convenience is simply worth it, as it is to many people, instead opting for a handful of well-selected, low-cost index funds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *